Goals Report

To chart your progress, use the Goals Report. You can also see a great view of your Goals Report from the MyFisdap page.

To view the Goals Report:

  1. Hover over the orange Reports tab, click New Reports.
  2. Find and click on the Graduation Requirements Report.
  3. Choose all the information you want to include in the report: goal set, date range, and shift type.
  4. Click Go to display the report.
  5. If you like, click the PDF icon  to get a printer-friendly report.

 

Observed Team Lead Report

To figure out why you may be getting credit for observing Team Leads rather than performing them, use the Observed Team Lead Report.

  1. Hover over the orange Reports tab, click New Reports.
  2. Find and click on Observed Team Lead Report.
  3. Limit by location and/or date (if you choose) and click Go.

The Observed Team Lead Report can also be a great resource when students are concerned about why they aren't getting credit for performing skills.

Many schools, especially if they are using the National Standard Curriculum goals as a guide, require students to perform the patient exam and the patient interview (collectively known as the comprehensive assessment) to get credit for performing the Team Lead. This report identifies shifts where students did not perform the Team Lead, patient exam, and/or patient interview. You can also click a link and go directly to the shift in question from the Observed Team Lead report output.

If you are not getting credit for performing the team lead, it may be because you indicated that you observed the patient exam and/or interview--and not entered suggests you skipped that section of data entry.

Hint: look for the orange diamond  in the Skills & Patient Care data entry form to indicate what information is critical for your National Standard Curriculum goals.

If you wish to change anything because your data was recorded improperly, you will need to ask an instructor to open the shift if it has been locked.

 

Eureka Graphs

The concept underlying the Eureka Graph originated from Dr. M.E. Wilson in England in 1991. Wilson studied 12 ambulance staff members, 14 Royal Navy medical assistants, and eight medical students during a two or three week training attachment to the department of anesthesia at the Royal United Hospital in England.

Wilson used a simple graph to chart each participant’s intravenous cannulation (IV) and endotracheal intubation (ET) attempts. For each successful attempt, the student’s graph climbed one notch and for each failure the graph descended one notch. Participants and staff reported that they found this method of charting their progress enjoyable.

Wilson defined competency as the point at which the slope of the curve on the participant’s graph reached a consistent 39 degree elevation (corresponding to an 80% success rate). In order to claim evidence of mastery, Wilson suggested that the student’s performance curve needed to stay above the 80% mark for more than 20 trials or attempts.

This concept of competency was first introduced to EMS education in the United State by Kim Grubbs from Johnson County Community College (Overland Park, Kansas) at the 1995 EMS Today Conference. We call the point at which the student's performance dramatically improved the Eureka Point.

Here's an explanation of how the Eureka Point works for field data in Fisdap:

  • For each successful skill attempt, the student's graph climbs one point; and for each unsuccessful attempt, the graph drops one point.
  • When the student reaches an 80% success rate over 20 attempts, the graph shows the moment of skill competence by drawing a dashed line (representing continued 80% success rate) as a continued reference point.
  • The colors on the graph help determine a trend in performance. Red indicates that there are fewer than 10 attempts and/or that the success rate is less than 60%. Yellow indicates that the success rate is between 60-79% in the last 10 attempts. Green indicates that the success rate is above 80% in the last 10 attempts.

Some examples:

Example 1

As you can see from the legend at the top of the graph, this is a report that was generated for Student 220. The report was requested for all IV attempts between August 1, 1998, and October 31, 1998. This student had performed 28 attempts in that period of time. This student has not yet reached the point of competency.

Example 2

Student 66 achieved competency in 29 IV attempts.  This graph is very typical of most Eureka Graphs.  The line hugs the baseline at the beginning, and then begins to gain a steady success climb.

The student remains close to the 80% (dashed) reference line after reaching the competency point.

Example 3

This student also reached a competency point, but did so much later in the program.

 

Here's how the Eureka Graph works for lab shifts:

While the Eureka Graph works the same for lab shifts, your instructors have greater greater flexibility with establishing goals for when students hit the Eureka Point. 

Instructors can customize the Eureka Graph by setting the numbers for successes over attempts. Instructors can use any numbers that they think are appropriate, and the student will hit the Eureka Point when he achieves X number of successes over Y attempts. 

As an example, instructors could create a goal of 4/5, 16/20 or 80/100 and so on depending on the requirements of your program.

 

 

For more information about the origin of the Eureka Graph, you can read the following journal articles:

1. Wilson, M.E. Assessing intravenous cannulation and tracheal intubation training. Anesthesia, 1991 Vol. 46 pp 578-9.

2. Konrad, C., Schupfer, G., Wietlisbach, M., Gerber, H. Learning manual skills in anesthesiology: Is there a recommended number of cases for anesthetic procedures? Anesth Analg 1998 Mar; 86(3):635-9